Pope Francis & Capitalism: Are We Overreacting?

Pope Francis Portrait Painting

Pope Francis Portrait Painting (Photo credit: faithmouse)

Pope Francis seems to be capturing the attention, not of just Catholics, but of all Christians these days. I constantly come across articles about the pope in Relevant Magazine and Christianity Today. His recent comments in Evangelli Gaudium encouraged a dynamic conversation among Christians last week, trying to make sense of what he meant in critiquing trickle-down economics. Was the pope condemning capitalism, or only a warped caricature of capitalism? 

At the Values and Capitalism blog, Tyler Castle agrees with Father Sirico’s response. The pope’s Latin roots are a core contributor to his misguided understanding of capitalism:

As Rev. Robert Sirico points out in a recent interview, Pope Francis is from Argentina where “free market capitalism” isn’t, in fact, all that free. The economic system in his home country is plagued by corruption and cronyism, which have greatly limited real economic freedom. Perhaps this is why he has such a cynical view of free markets?

[…] Ultimately, the Pope is right to be intensely concerned about the poor—Jesus demands that we be. He is also right to be wary of the excesses of free markets. But he fails to give capitalism credit for the widespread prosperity that it has been responsible for.

Wayne Grudem said yesterday at the Family Research Council in Washington D.C. that Argentina is the 160th freest country in the world our of 177 countries according the the Heritage Economic Freedom Index, so it’s no wonder the pope has a negative view towards capitalism. He’s more acquainted with corrupt, crony capitalism rather than true economic freedom. Jay Richards echoes this by saying,

Unfortunately, the apostolic letter doesn’t distinguish “capitalism” from “cronyism,” so the document may prove less challenging, and so less “prophetic,” than if it had handled these matters with precision.

If Pope Francis really knew what free markets looked like, I suspect he may change his position.

But are we letting ourselves get a little too riled up about all this? Are we missing the pope’s main point? Perhaps.

Pope Francis isn’t an economist. Nor are many other priests, pastors, or ministers. And we can’t expect them to be. James Pethokoukis at the National Review Online reminds us not to forget the heart of his message:

But one doesn’t need to be Catholic or a Christian of any kind to realize that it is impossible to understand the pope’s message if one fails to view it through the lens of Jesus’ teachings. Of course Pope Francis doesn’t believe market capitalism — although the greatest wealth generator ever discovered and the economic system most supportive of human freedom — is the ultimate cure to what ails humanity or the key to true human flourishing. It’s not the Bain Way one should expect to be at the heart of the pope’s message, it’s Christ’s.

I don’t excuse the pope’s denunciation of capitalism. Since he’s so passionate about the Christian duty to care for the poor, I wish he saw the potential of free markets and enterprise in lifting whole nations out of poverty. But while pointing this out is important, Pethokukis has a point. Let’s tackle his critique of capitalism charitably, while at the same time striving to lift up the truth that lies beneath the sticky semantics and misguided economics of Evangelli Gaudium: the joy of the Gospel.

Advertisements

3 comments

  1. Margaret

    The pope had best leave economics to those who understand it. What his statements have done is give fuel to the Left at a time when all aspects of Christianity and its heritage, Western culture, are under enormous attack as they hope to remake us into a giant socialist experiment. Just in Illinois, the few Democrat hold-outs in the Assembly used his remarks about “Who am I to judge?” homosexuals as their reason to capitulate to supporting same-sex marriage. Many of those legislators who voted in favor were “Catholics” who quoted the pope. I think he is doing serious damage to the Church in its struggle to maintain any semblance of teaching on human sexuality. If I, an ordinary Catholic lacking degrees in theology, flinched when I read his interview in America, then he should never have been so naive and then compounded his anti-capitalism remarks in Evangelii Gaudium.

    The USCCB over a decade ago pronounced on economic matters and made a Leftist hash of it and took loud criticism for their efforts. Didn’t anyone learn from that? I realize that the pope has his own personal history in the forefront of his mind in his remarks, but he should have spent more time traveling the world and getting to know societies more thoroughly before issuing an encyclical.

    Further, I took the trouble to read his dialogues with his good friend, Rabbi Skorka, On Heaven and Earth. He seems to skirt heresy in some of his remarks. I think he wants too much to be liked so he hedged his remarks to not offend his friend. Skorka, I noticed, did not hedge his remarks at all where he disagreed with Catholicism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s